<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M2M Wireless Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://m2m.orangeom.com/m2m-wireless-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://m2m.orangeom.com/m2m-wireless-security/</link>
	<description>A place to keep track of M2M trends in a world where machines are interconnected.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:24:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jan</title>
		<link>http://m2m.orangeom.com/m2m-wireless-security/comment-page-1/#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator>jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m2m.orangeom.com/m2m-wireless-security/#comment-1683</guid>
		<description>Besdes to the &quot;dual signaling&quot; requirement by the new standard, i think there ist one more reason to choose wireless M2M:

Using the &quot;always-online&quot; feature of GPRS, EDGE, UMTS networks, the health of the signalling can always be monitored - no dead lines in wireless M2M.
 
I write on http://m2m-blog.de about wireless M2M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besdes to the &#8220;dual signaling&#8221; requirement by the new standard, i think there ist one more reason to choose wireless M2M:</p>
<p>Using the &#8220;always-online&#8221; feature of GPRS, EDGE, UMTS networks, the health of the signalling can always be monitored &#8211; no dead lines in wireless M2M.</p>
<p>I write on <a href="http://m2m-blog.de" rel="nofollow">http://m2m-blog.de</a> about wireless M2M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

